Wikipedia’s Notability Questioned Again
Once again Wikipedia has decided that ioquake3 isn’t notable. Just like the last time, the argument against the ioquake3 wikipedia entry is without merit:
All I have to say in response to Marasmusine’s argument against ioquake3’s entry is:
January 5th, 2010 at 4:34 am
You realize that this doesn’t actually help the situation, right? We sound like whiny little girls now. Thanks.
January 5th, 2010 at 3:20 pm
Isn’t the whole point of a game engine to provide a foundation for a game, or other projects?
If this is so, then shouldn’t mere mention of its use provide notability?
If it was to be deleted, the articles on wikipedia for those projects that use ioquake3 would then say “this project is powered by the ioquake3 engine, etc” without a link, and someone, wanting to know more about it, would request an article. It provides information about the base that these other projects were built on.
January 6th, 2010 at 8:45 pm
so, he says it isn’t notable, yet he contributes a rather lengthy list of zx spectrum games, that are no where near as noteworthy, it just don’t seem right
January 7th, 2010 at 1:24 am
ZX Spectrum
“The ZX Spectrum (Pronounced: “Zed Ecks Spec-trum” in its original British English branding) is an 8-bit personal home computer released in the United Kingdom in 1982 by Sinclair Research Ltd.”
I didn’t know that even existed. The more you know. I suppose it has historical significance.
January 15th, 2010 at 11:30 pm
i say we delete his list of ZX Spectrum games, i mean, who actually used the ZX Spectrum to play games?, Everyone was using the Commodore or Atari computers, and if not that, the Atari or NES