This entry was posted
on Sunday, May 4th, 2008 at 11:12 am and is filed under .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
That’s not a stereoscopic image (viewed by pointing one eye at each image – either by crossing your eyes or by doing the magic-eye thing with parallel eyes); that’s an anaglyph (red-and-blue glasses).
Stereoscopic images can be anaglyph, cross eyed, parallel eyed, and any other technique there may or may not be.
anaglyph is a subgroup
Cross-eyed is a subgroup
Stereoscopy is not as stereoscopy means any kind of 3d
However, ”naked-eye” is much better than anaglyph
April 5th, 2009 at 7:36 am
That’s not a stereoscopic image (viewed by pointing one eye at each image – either by crossing your eyes or by doing the magic-eye thing with parallel eyes); that’s an anaglyph (red-and-blue glasses).
July 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 am
Stereoscopic images can be anaglyph, cross eyed, parallel eyed, and any other technique there may or may not be.
anaglyph is a subgroup
Cross-eyed is a subgroup
Stereoscopy is not as stereoscopy means any kind of 3d
However, ”naked-eye” is much better than anaglyph