Comments on: ioquake3 now IPv6 capable http://ioquake3.org/2008/04/21/ioquake3-now-ipv6-capable/ Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:17:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ajmas http://ioquake3.org/2008/04/21/ioquake3-now-ipv6-capable/comment-page-1/#comment-508 ajmas Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:40:59 +0000 http://ioquake3.org/?p=59#comment-508 I wonder whether it would be worth adding Zeroconf support (Avahi, Bonjour) for advertising and discovery of servers on the local subnet? I wonder whether it would be worth adding Zeroconf support (Avahi, Bonjour) for advertising and discovery of servers on the local subnet?

]]> By: zachary http://ioquake3.org/2008/04/21/ioquake3-now-ipv6-capable/comment-page-1/#comment-75 zachary Sun, 04 May 2008 18:54:03 +0000 http://ioquake3.org/?p=59#comment-75 http://ioquake3.org/files/angst/ http://ioquake3.org/files/angst/

]]> By: Y http://ioquake3.org/2008/04/21/ioquake3-now-ipv6-capable/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Y Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:04:52 +0000 http://ioquake3.org/?p=59#comment-74 nice work! btw: would it be possible to offer any current binaries? your builds [http://ioquake3.org/get-it/] are like from stone age. especially a win32-binary would be nice, since the fewest have a compiler on their windows systems. nice work!

btw: would it be possible to offer any current binaries? your builds [http://ioquake3.org/get-it/] are like from stone age. especially a win32-binary would be nice, since the fewest have a compiler on their windows systems.

]]>